29.05.2023 | 09:38
IgorD kaže:
Ja: Is Manolić alive?
Chat: No, Joža Manolić passed away on June 27, 2020, at the age of 100.
Ja: Really?
Chat: Yes, according to various news sources and obituaries, Joža Manolić passed away on June 27, 2020, at the age of 100 in Zagreb, Croatia.
Ja: Can you provide a link to obituary?
Chat: Yes, here is a link to an obituary for Joža Manolić published in the Croatian newspaper "Jutarnji list" (in Croatian):
www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/preminu...telja-hdz-a-15034898
Chat: And here is a link to an obituary published by the news agency HINA (in English):
www.hina.hr/en/news-of-croatia/former-pm...s-aged-100/10238313/
Nakon natezanja i uvjeravanja da su linkovi bez veze, dao mi je još bezveznih linkova. Nakon što sam pitao da sam provjeri svoje linkove ispričao se što mi daje linkove koji su u "međuvremenu" postali nedostupni ali mi je dao masu novih koji su opet vodili na nepostojeće stranice.
Citiram sam sebe jer sam danas naletio na nešto poput moje rasprave s Chatom i njegovih izmišljenih linkova ali ovo je puno ozbiljnije:
A lawyer used ChatGPT for legal filing. The chatbot cited nonexistent cases it just made up
> He relied on ChatGPT in his legal filings and the AI chatbot completely manufactured previous cases, which Schwartz cited, out of thin air
> ChatGPT provided Schwartz with multiple names of similar cases: Varghese v. China Southern Airlines, Shaboon v. Egyptair, Petersen v. Iran Air, Martinez v. Delta Airlines, Estate of Durden v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, and Miller v. United Airlines.
> The problem? ChatGPT completely made up all those cases. They do not exist.