cariblanco kaže:


Pa eto, Musk se hoće malo povući iz DODGEa, jer "napadaju ga liberali, ljevičari.." oh kakva pahuljica, čim ga se krenulo pikati i podbadati sa memeovima odmah se pokunjio.. A i prodaja Tesle mu je krenula nizbrdo, očigledno

dpasaric kaže:


Trump odlučio sada ne igrati "hardball" sa Xi-em i spominjati Kini "Covid19" jer odsada "we're gonna play nice".
Očigledno mu blef nije upalio a možda jer su mu republikanci počeli kvocati da što čini.. Tko će ga znati, ali to je njegov "art of the deal". Povukao se a dam se kladiti da se on ispričao Kini a ne obrnuto.
Papak.

elem, ako je testirao što gdje može izvući (i vratiti stvari na redovno stanje) znači da nije nikakav majstor jer ako mora "testirati" in real life, tako javno i onda se poniziti, onda je stvarno malouman. Dobio je jezikovu juhu i po prstima i sada je kuš. "We're gonna play nice", ma nemoj?

Puno mojih vozaca zivi u MN, a to je state koji se granici sa Kanadom. Oni se ocigledno energntima napajaju iz Kanade.

Dobili su vec obavijesti da ce im racuni za struju biti uvecani $90-120 radi povecanja troskva poslovanja i carinskih stopa.

I opet Kanadi psuju mater, a ne Trumpu

Tako da, ne sikiram ja se za njega dok mu je ovakvih glasaca

www.youtube.com/shorts/2Zvb9dWUCYc

Trump

Musk

Tko je treći?

Bonanza!
Trump opet jaše!

Taj lik nije svoj.
“I didn’t know, but also I knew, and also it went bad. And why are you so mean to me?” —Trump, basically.

Ovaj razgovor je nešto poput Monty Python transkripta nekog njihovog skeča!
Otkud god kreneš čitati nevjerojatno je kako odiše narcizmom i egotripom.. Samo "ja, ja, ja.." u superlativima!

time.com/7280114/donald-trump-2025-interview-transcript/

You have to understand, I'm dealing with all the companies, very friendly countries. We're meeting with China. We're doing fine with everybody. But ultimately, I've made all the deals.


Ma krasno, ma divno, kako opuštajuće, kako dubokoumno, kako milozvučno, anđeoski..

I ovo, ma che bello!!

You said you would end the war in Ukraine on Day One.

Well, I said that figuratively, and I said that as an exaggeration, because to make a point, and you know, it gets, of course, by the fake news [unintelligible]. Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that it will be ended.

Well what’s taking so long? When do you think it will be ended?

Well, I don’t think it’s long. I mean, look, I got here three months ago. This war has been going on for three years. It's a war that would have never happened if I was president. It's Biden's war. It’s not my war. I have nothing to do with it. I would have never had this war. This war would have never happened. Putin would have never done it. This war would have never happened. Oct. 6 would have never happened. Oct. 7 would have never happened. Would have never happened. Ever. You then say, what’s taking so long? Do you hear this, Steve? The war has been raging for three years. I just got here, and you say, what's taken so long?

Do you think peace is still possible if Putin is President?

I think peace is possible. You say if Putin is still president?

Yeah, if Putin is President. Can there be peace if Putin is President of Russia?

I think with me as president, there's—possible, if very probable. If somebody else is president, no chance.

p.s. First-person references (I, me, my, mine, myself): about 220 times

Superlatives/adjectives like "tremendous," "great," "amazing," "flawless," "massive," etc.: around 45 instances

mislim, sta reci?
prvo se iznenadio da je bajden imao intervju sa njima, pre godinu dana. onda pita kako je prosao intervju.
u sledecem pasusu kaze da je citao intervju, i onda napada bajdena al nista ne spominje konkretno iz intervjua.

ma laze kako zine, i naravno - ja, pa ja.

DOGE se hvali kako je uštedio novce. www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/doge-cuts-cost-...vernment-efficiency/ - DOGE says it has saved $160 billion. Those cuts have cost taxpayers $135 billion, one analysis says.

Komentar sa reddita:
Here's the BBC's best attempts at analysing the data:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn4j33klz33o

Their initial pledge was $2T, this was lowered to $1T, and they currently claim to have saved $0.16T

Of this $160 billion, around $60 billion of it is itimised. As in, when they list out the individual savings they claim to have made, it totals $60 billion. This isn't savings they've proven, it's the sum of savings they claim to have made to date.

Finally $32.5B, or $0.01325T of the initial $2T pledged, has receipts, and are proven short term savings. This obviously ignores the long term costs these 'savings' will bring.

i ovaj:

Do we have anything other than DOGE's word that they've saved $160 billion?

Also, given the amount of chaos sown as DOGE rips through Washington, do we know what kind of long term costs these cuts are going to incur? Like, slashing funding to programs that do important things may have a long term expense for whatever eventuality the program was formed to prevent.

Trump Is Paving the Way for Another ‘China Shock’

> I think the Trump folks are asking the right question. But they’ve come up with just about the worst answer

> But these tariffs are going to do the opposite. We’re not just putting tariffs on tennis sneakers. We’re putting tariffs on steel, on rare earths, on machine parts, which means we’re raising the cost of the inputs for all the things we make. That makes those frontier sectors way less competitive. If we want to keep these industries flourishing, we need them to be able to export to the rest of the world. And who the hell is going to buy our cars or planes if we’ve suddenly made them more expensive?

> I actually think we can learn something from China’s example. Ten years ago, China decided they wanted to be at the frontier of a handful of sectors: drones, semiconductors, EVs, solar cells, etc. And for those sectors, they did a combination of protection alongside a lot of public investment. There was also some intellectual-property theft in there, for sure. But the bottom line is, China is now a leader in many of those sectors. Companies like BYD or Xiaomi or Huawei are some of the best in the world. They don’t even need the protection or the subsidies anymore. They are just good.

Zanimljiv interview, autori MIT studije iz 2016. pod naslovom China Shock vjeruju da je Kina pojela Amerima neke proizvodne poslove ali da ti poslovi sad iz Kine idu u Vijetnam, Kambođu itd. jer ni Kinezi to više ne žele a kamoli Amerikanci. Ono što brine je da će Trump potjerati kompanije kao Apple, Ford i Boeing iz Amerike.

Pa većina podružnica npr Forda , GElectric, što ti ja znam, su otišle u Kinu i tamo napravile manje tvornice jer im je jeftinije. Tko će se vratiti u ameriku kad ni sami ameri neće raditi posao. Em im je školstvo isto sad u banani, pa će imati sve gluplju naciju (što je isto plan jer glupim ljudima se lakše vlada i tlači i nema bojazni da će ove na vlasti netko "prozrijeti") pa neće moći ljudi niti biti kvlaificirani za poslove. Doslovno ekipa iz filma Wall-E i Idiocracy.

Dva baš uznemirujuća linka, ali dobro, polako se navikavamo:

1) Key Apple supplier says ’empty shelves’ likely within two months as tariffs bite

2) Joint Subreddit Statement: The Attack on U.S. Research Infrastructure

Smrt znanosti u Americi? Svak dan je sve luđi

Evo, Bezos odlučio da će Amazon pokazivati dvije cijene za artikl.. onu koja bi bila da nema trumpovih tarifa i sa trenutnim tarifama tj koliko je proizvod skuplji.
Trump odmah: "izdaja", "nasilje", "neprijateljstvo", "političke smicalice"..
Evo odgovora njegove plave glasnogovornice:
v.redd.it/4yhsjdwx9sxe1

www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/white-house-blas...d-political-act.html

Amazon later clarified that the plan to show tariff surcharges was “never approved” and is “not going to happen.”

Ha! Izgleda da Bezos nema karte, da ne drži karte.

Yonkis kaže:


Mene samo zanima, koliko dugo će ameri trpiti naranđastog. Stvarno je zlatna ona narodna poslovica...pusti budalu da priča. Treba mu tu i tamo ponekad umjetno dignuti rep ( normalno da neće to skužiti ), pa da se ukopa do kraja.

Trpiti će ga jer će se bogatuni i dalje bogatiti pod njim i gurati ga sve dok imaju koristi a on će im pogodovati tako da je to pouzdana “ruku ruku mije”, a njegovi lojalisti će i dalje davati podršku jer “own the Libs” pod svaku cijenu, a jadna raja će i dalje trpiti njegove BS jer će vjerovati u bolje sutra i njegova obećanja. Dok se ne desi jedan pa onda još jedan Luigi Mangione.. Kad krenu padati neke glavešine. Onda bi mogla krenuti opća represija a raja se primiti oružja. A njega imaju fala Bogu…
Kad smo kod oružja..
Meni i dalje je totalno nejasan onaj pokušaj atentata. To nitko ne spominje. Pa čak ni on. To mi je totalna nepoznanica, nedorečeno.

Ovo je postalo naporno. Koliko gluposti u samo par dana.






Pa ova ulizica:


www.reddit.com/r/thescoop/comments/1kbne...st_100_days_has_far/
To je ta ista, Pam Bondu



the CEOs of Walmart and Target warned Trump that the shelves are about to be empty... And he just mocked them to the press.

pescanik.net/trka-za-spas-podataka/

zasto me ovo podseca na srednji vek, inkviziciju i paljenje knjiga?

Yonkis kaže:


Nisam siguran, da će ga dugo trpjeti (ili moći trpjeti), on radi toliko štete da će to jako brzo doći do PONR, ako već i nije.
Mislim, da nema ni ožiljka? A frajer ga okrznuo sa 7,62 ili koliko već?

5.56×45mm NATO zrno. Ispada da je pogođen onaj blesimetar i da su njega okrznule tj "ranile" krhotine tog pleksiglasa.
To što je poginuo jedan lik, 2 što se izvuklo naknadno. I Trump ih nikada posjetio, obišao, samo je zrazio sućut poginuloj obitelji i izrazio molitve i pozive za ujedinjenje. Otprilike tri puta je javno spomenuo taj pokušaj atentata i onda rekao "So many people have asked me what happened... and therefore I will tell you exactly what happened, and you'll never hear it from me a second time, because it's actually too painful to tell"..
Jadan on. Ali zato može desetak puta spominjati kako ga novinari napadaju.
To mi sve smrdi.
Ali cipelu je morao naći, jer bi se vidjelo da nosi platforme. Ili Ili cipele. I kao što se vidi na videu, ovo zadnje "wait wait wait" i onda šaka u zrak..
Sve mi izgleda kao namještaljka. Plan je da dobije veću podršku jer eto, htjelo ga se ubiti. To što je lik bio republikanac, nemam pojma, ali se očigledno išlo na to da su moguće žrtve. Isto tako, tko bi se žrtvovao da ga se ubije kao atentatora? Ovo na kraju sa šakom u zraku, kao da je dio scenografije. "Moram odraditi šaku u zraku na kraju svega, skoro sam zaboravio na to".
Ne znam, situacija zrela za ove što vole zavjere.

Jebogaja tog što je pucao, trebao je još 15 metaka izvježbati pa da bude sigurniji u pucanju.

Yonkis kaže:


ja i dalje mislim da je Melanija najbolji kandidat za atentatora, samo je treba ubediti
nema tragova, sve cisto kao suza. i svi zadovoljni.

Ender kaže:


Ali, sloveki kažeš sjedni a ona legne! Tako da ...?

Zar vi planirate atentat na americkog predsednika?

Petak je, kraj tjedna, što bi drugo radili nego planirali atentate. Samo moramo posložiti prioritete.

Cemu opsesija Trumpom?

Mene je taj lik kostao jako puno pa se opet ne zamaram s njim.

Nek ga Ameri trpe, oni moraju, imamo mi domacih politickih budala na izvoz.